Formula AI vs model AI represents two distinct approaches to AI-assisted spreadsheet work. Formula AI generates individual formulas or explains existing ones cell-by-cell, requiring users to build the model structure manually. Model AI generates complete, integrated multi-tab spreadsheets with formulas, formatting, and architecture pre-built, delivering working files from natural language descriptions.
Want a product comparison? See Apers vs. Microsoft Copilot.
What Formula AI Does
Formula AI assists with individual cell-level operations. You highlight a cell or range, describe what calculation you need, and the AI suggests a formula. The interaction is transactional: one request, one formula. The AI does not build the surrounding model structure, create tabs, or link calculations across worksheets. It focuses narrowly on translating your intent into Excel syntax.
The typical workflow: You open Excel and create a blank workbook. You manually set up the structure—create tabs for "Assumptions," "Pro Forma," "Returns." You label rows: Year 1, Year 2, through Year 7. You label columns: Revenue, Expenses, NOI, Cash Flow. You create cells for inputs: purchase price in B3, cap rate in B4, annual growth in B5.
Now you need a formula to calculate Year 2 revenue. You highlight cell C10 (Year 2 revenue). You prompt the formula AI: "Calculate Year 2 revenue as Year 1 revenue multiplied by 1 plus growth rate." The AI suggests: =B10*(1+$B$5). You review it. The reference to B10 (Year 1 revenue) looks correct. The reference to $B$5 (growth rate) is properly absolute-referenced. You accept the formula. It populates cell C10.
You move to the next cell. Year 2 expenses. You highlight D10. You prompt: "Calculate Year 2 expenses as Year 1 expenses increased by 2%." The AI suggests: =D9*1.02. You accept. You repeat this process for every formula in the model: NOI, debt service, equity distributions, IRR calculation. Each cell requires a separate AI interaction.
Formula AI also explains existing formulas. You open a model someone else built. Cell F25 contains a complex nested IF statement. You do not understand it. You ask the AI: "Explain the formula in F25." The AI responds: "This formula checks if the IRR exceeds 15%. If yes, it calculates the GP share as 30% of remaining cash flow. If no, it calculates the GP share as 20%. The IRR is calculated from the cash flow range B15:B22 using the XIRR function."
This explanation helps you understand the logic without manually tracing precedents and parsing the syntax. But the AI did not build the model. It interpreted what a human built.
Formula AI handles error diagnosis. A cell shows #REF! error. You ask: "Why is cell D18 showing an error?" The AI analyzes the formula: =C18+E15. It checks: Cell C18 exists and contains a value. Cell E15 does not exist (the column only goes to D). The AI responds: "Cell E15 does not exist. The formula references a non-existent cell. Did you mean E18 or D15?" You correct the reference. The error clears.
Formula AI improves productivity on formula syntax. If you cannot remember whether VLOOKUP's syntax is (lookup_value, table_array, col_index, range_lookup) or some other order, you ask the AI. It provides the correct syntax and an example. You adapt the example to your specific range and proceed.
But Formula AI does not build architecture. It does not decide: this model needs 5 tabs, structured in this sequence, with these specific calculation dependencies. It does not generate hundreds of linked formulas in a coherent structure. It works cell-by-cell, task-by-task.
What Model AI Does
Model AI generates entire financial models from high-level descriptions. You describe the model you need—"Build a 10-year multifamily acquisition pro forma with 150 units, $18M purchase, 70% LTV, 5% interest, and 8% LP pref"—and the AI outputs a complete Excel file. The file includes multiple tabs: Assumptions, Rent Roll, Operating Expenses, Debt Schedule, Cash Flow Waterfall, Returns Summary. Each tab has formulas linking to the others. Inputs are separated from calculations. Calculations feed into outputs. The structure is coherent and functional.
The workflow: You do not open Excel first. You interact with the Model AI through a web interface or API. You submit a prompt describing the deal and the model structure you need. The AI processes your prompt, determines the required components, generates the spreadsheet architecture, writes formulas for all cells, applies formatting, and outputs a native .xlsx file. You download the file, open it in Excel, and review the structure.
The generated model has tabs. The Assumptions tab contains inputs: purchase price ($18,000,000 in cell B3), unit count (150 in cell B4), debt-to-value ratio (70% in B5), interest rate (5% in B6), hold period (10 years in B7), LP ownership (90% in B8), preferred return rate (8% in B9). These cells use defined names (Purchase_Price, Units, LTV) that other tabs reference.
The Rent Roll tab calculates total rental income. It has 150 rows, one per unit. Each row lists: Unit Number, Square Feet, Rent per Square Foot, Monthly Rent, Annual Rent. The model AI generated this structure because "150 units" in the prompt triggered a unit-level rent roll template. The formulas in the Annual Rent column reference the Monthly Rent column and multiply by 12: =E10*12. This pattern repeats for all 150 units. Cell B160 sums total annual rent: =SUM(E10:E159).
The Operating Expenses tab lists expense categories: Property Management (5% of revenue), Repairs & Maintenance ($500 per unit), Property Taxes (1.2% of purchase price), Insurance, Utilities. Each category has a formula referencing either revenue from the Rent Roll tab or inputs from the Assumptions tab. Property Management: ='Rent Roll'!B160*0.05. Repairs & Maintenance: =Assumptions!B4*500. Total Operating Expenses sums all categories.
The Debt Schedule tab calculates loan balance, interest, and principal payments over 10 years. Initial loan amount: =Assumptions!B3*Assumptions!B5 (purchase price times LTV). Annual interest: =Beginning_Balance*Assumptions!B6. For an interest-only period (common in commercial loans), principal is zero for the first few years. For amortizing debt, principal equals payment minus interest. The formulas reflect standard debt schedule logic.
The Cash Flow Waterfall tab distributes cash after debt service to LP and GP partners. Tier 1 returns capital: LP receives 90% of equity, GP receives 10%. Tier 2 pays the 8% preferred return on unreturned capital. Tier 3 splits remaining cash 90/10 until an IRR hurdle (e.g., 15%) is met, then splits shift to 70/30. The formulas implementing this logic span 20-30 cells with conditional IRR checks and cumulative tracking.
The Returns Summary tab calculates IRR, equity multiple, and cash-on-cash return for both LP and GP. These calculations reference cash flow arrays from the Waterfall tab and use Excel's XIRR function: =XIRR(LP_Cash_Flows, Dates).
All of this structure—tabs, formulas, cross-references, formatting—was generated by the Model AI in a single operation. The analyst did not create tabs. Did not label rows. Did not write formulas. The AI built the entire architecture from the prompt.
The analyst's job is review and customization. Check the formulas for accuracy. Adjust assumptions to match deal specifics. Add custom expense categories. Modify the waterfall structure if the deal has non-standard promote terms. The heavy lifting—structural design and formula writing—is done.
Why Complete Models Beat Formula Fragments
Complete models reduce integration errors. When an AI generates all formulas in a cohesive structure, cross-references are consistent. The Debt Schedule references the correct purchase price cell from Assumptions. The Waterfall references the correct cash flow cells from the Operating Pro Forma. Cell references are verified during generation.
With formula fragments, integration is manual. You generate a formula for Year 2 revenue: =B10*(1+$B$5). Later, you add a row above the assumptions section. The growth rate moves from B5 to B6. But the revenue formula still references B5, which now contains a different value. The formula breaks. You must manually find and update all references. In a 500-formula model, this is error-prone and time-consuming.
Complete models save time on structure design. Deciding how to organize a multi-tab model takes cognitive effort. Which calculations go on which tab? How should tabs be sequenced? Where should inputs live—one centralized tab or distributed across relevant tabs? These are design decisions that consume 30-40% of model-building time.
Model AI makes these decisions based on learned conventions. Assumptions go on Tab 1. Detail schedules (Rent Roll, Debt Schedule) go on Tabs 2-3. Summary calculations (Returns, Sensitivity) go on final tabs. This structure matches industry norms. The analyst does not spend time designing; they spend time reviewing and adjusting.
Complete models are auditable as a unit. The analyst can trace logic from inputs through calculations to outputs in a coherent flow. With formula fragments, the analyst builds the flow manually. If an error exists, it is difficult to determine whether it is a formula error (AI-generated wrong syntax) or a structural error (analyst linked cells incorrectly).
Complete models handle complexity better. A waterfall with 4 tiers, catch-up provisions, and multiple equity classes requires 100+ interdependent formulas. Generating these formulas individually with Formula AI is tedious. You must manually ensure the Tier 2 catch-up formula references the correct cumulative distributions from Tier 1, that the IRR calculation includes the right cash flow range, that the LP and GP shares sum to 100%. Model AI generates the entire structure at once, with dependencies resolved automatically.
When to Use Each Approach
Use Formula AI when you already have a model structure and need help with specific calculations. You built a custom real estate model with a non-standard waterfall structure. The overall architecture is set. You need assistance writing a complex formula for the catch-up provision. Formula AI provides that formula. You insert it into your existing structure. The tool augments your work without replacing your design.
Use Formula AI when modifying legacy models. Your firm has a 10-year-old acquisition model template built by a former analyst. The structure is firm-specific and embedded in workflows. You do not want to replace it. But you need to update several formulas to reflect new accounting standards. Formula AI helps you rewrite those formulas while preserving the existing architecture.
Use Formula AI when learning Excel. Junior analysts building foundational Excel skills benefit from seeing formula construction step-by-step. Formula AI explains the syntax, shows examples, and helps the analyst understand how formulas work. This pedagogical value is lost with Model AI, which generates complete structures without explaining individual formula logic.
Use Formula AI for one-off calculations. You need a quick IRR calculation for a back-of-the-envelope analysis. You do not need a full model—just a single formula. Formula AI provides it. You insert the formula in a scratch worksheet and get your answer.
Use Model AI when building a new model from scratch. You are evaluating a multifamily acquisition and need a complete pro forma. You do not have an existing template that fits. Model AI generates the entire structure, saving you 2-3 hours of manual setup. You review the output, adjust assumptions, and have a working model in 30 minutes.
Use Model AI when analyzing multiple similar deals. A private equity fund evaluates 50 acquisition targets annually. Each requires a financial model. The structure is repetitive: same tabs, same calculations, different inputs. Model AI generates these models in seconds. The analyst focuses time on deal-specific due diligence, not Excel setup.
Use Model AI when you need a standard structure fast. You are preparing for an investment committee meeting tomorrow. You need a basic DCF model to present a valuation. You do not have time to build from scratch. Model AI generates a standard DCF structure (cash flows, discount rate, terminal value, NPV calculation) in under a minute. You populate the cash flow projections and present.
Use Model AI when you lack deep Excel expertise. Not all professionals are Excel experts. A portfolio manager with strong investment judgment but weak Excel skills can use Model AI to generate models without mastering formula syntax. The manager describes the financial structure; the AI handles the technical execution.
The Workflow Comparison
Consider an analyst evaluating Deal "Parkview Apartments"—a 120-unit multifamily property in Nashville. Purchase price: $14,500,000. Equity: $5,075,000 (35%). Debt: $9,425,000 at 5.25% interest-only for 3 years, then 25-year amortization. Current occupancy: 94%. Average rent: $1,250/month. Operating expense ratio: 42%. Hold period: 7 years. Exit cap rate: 5.5%.
Workflow with Formula AI:
Hour 0:00 - Analyst opens Excel, creates tabs: Assumptions, Rent Roll, Operating Pro Forma, Debt Schedule, Waterfall, Returns.
Hour 0:15 - Analyst labels rows and columns on each tab. Rent Roll: Unit #, Sq Ft, Rent/SF, Monthly Rent, Annual Rent (120 rows). Operating Pro Forma: Year 0 through Year 7 columns, row labels for Revenue, Expenses, NOI, Debt Service, Cash Flow.
Hour 0:45 - Analyst begins formulas. Highlights cell B10 (Year 1 Rental Income). Prompts Formula AI: "Sum of annual rent from Rent Roll tab." AI suggests: ='Rent Roll'!SUM(E10:E129). Analyst accepts.
Hour 1:00 - Analyst moves to next cell. Year 1 Operating Expenses. Prompts: "Calculate as 42% of rental income." AI suggests: =B10*0.42. Analyst accepts.
Hour 1:15 - Analyst calculates NOI: =B10-B11. Manually typed (simple subtraction, no AI needed).
Hour 1:30 - Analyst moves to Debt Schedule tab. Prompts Formula AI for interest calculation. AI suggests formula. Analyst accepts. Prompts for principal amortization. AI suggests formula. Analyst accepts. Links debt service to Operating Pro Forma.
Hour 2:00 - Analyst works on Waterfall tab. Tier 1 Return of Capital. Prompts AI for LP distribution formula. AI suggests: =Assumptions!B5*0.65 (equity times LP share). Analyst accepts. Repeats for GP. Moves to Tier 2 Preferred Return. Prompts AI for cumulative pref formula with compounding. AI suggests complex formula. Analyst accepts.
Hour 2:30 - Analyst builds Tier 3 profit split with IRR hurdle. Prompts AI for conditional formula: IF IRR > 15%, split 70/30, else split 65/35. AI suggests nested IF with XIRR. Analyst reviews, adjusts cell references to match actual cash flow range, accepts.
Hour 3:00 - Analyst finishes formulas. Begins testing: changes inputs, verifies outputs recalculate correctly. Finds #REF! error in one cell. Asks Formula AI to diagnose. AI identifies broken reference. Analyst fixes.
Hour 3:30 - Model complete and verified. Total time: 3.5 hours.
Workflow with Model AI:
Hour 0:00 - Analyst opens Model AI platform (web interface). Enters prompt: "Build a 7-year multifamily acquisition model for Parkview Apartments. 120 units, $14.5M purchase, 35% equity, 65% debt at 5.25% interest-only for 3 years then 25-year amortization. Current rent $1,250/month, 94% occupancy. OpEx 42% of revenue. Exit cap 5.5%. Include rent roll, debt schedule, and LP/GP waterfall with 65/35 split and 8% LP pref."
Hour 0:01 - Model AI generates complete .xlsx file in 45 seconds. Analyst downloads and opens.
Hour 0:05 - Analyst reviews tabs: Assumptions (all inputs populated), Rent Roll (120 units with formulas), Operating Pro Forma (7-year projection), Debt Schedule (interest-only logic for years 1-3, amortization starting year 4), Waterfall (3-tier structure with pref), Returns (IRR and multiple calculations).
Hour 0:15 - Analyst checks formulas. Rent Roll annual rent formula: =D10*12 (monthly rent times 12). Correct. Operating Pro Forma Year 2 revenue: =C10*(1+$Assumptions.$B$8) (prior year times 1 plus growth rate). Correct. Debt Schedule Year 4 principal: =PMT($Assumptions.$B$7/12, 25*12, -Beginning_Balance). Correct.
Hour 0:30 - Analyst identifies one issue: Model AI assumed 3% rent growth, but analyst wants 2.5%. Adjusts assumption in Assumptions tab cell B8. All dependent formulas recalculate automatically.
Hour 0:40 - Analyst adds custom expense category (property management software subscription, $15K annually). Inserts row in Operating Expenses tab, labels it, enters $15K. Updates total expenses formula to include new row.
Hour 0:50 - Analyst adds sensitivity table: IRR sensitivity to exit cap rate (4.5% to 6.5% in 0.5% increments). Prompts Model AI in refinement chat: "Add two-way sensitivity table for IRR varying exit cap and rent growth." AI generates table and links it to Returns tab.
Hour 1:00 - Model complete and customized. Total time: 1 hour.
Time savings: 2.5 hours. The analyst used that saved time to conduct deeper due diligence: researching Nashville submarket rent trends, analyzing comparable sales, reviewing property inspection reports.
Making the Right Choice
Choose Formula AI if you value control and customization over speed. Building a model manually with Formula AI assistance gives you complete authority over every design decision. The tab structure is exactly what you want. The formula placement is precisely where you chose. The calculation sequence follows your mental model. This approach suits analysts who have strong opinions about model architecture and want granular control.
Choose Model AI if you prioritize speed and standardization. You need working models fast. You are comfortable with industry-standard conventions. The AI's design choices align with your needs 80-90% of the time. Small adjustments are acceptable. This approach suits analysts who view model-building as a means to an end—the goal is deal evaluation, not Excel artistry.
Choose Formula AI for firm-specific templates. Your firm has proprietary model structures honed over years. These templates reflect institutional knowledge and regulatory requirements. Replacing them with AI-generated models loses that value. Use Formula AI to enhance these templates (better formulas, error-checking) while preserving the structure.
Choose Model AI for ad-hoc analysis. You encounter a new deal type your firm has not analyzed before—a data center acquisition, a life sciences property, a ground-up development. You lack an existing template. Model AI generates a starting structure based on learned patterns from similar deals. You refine from there.
Choose Formula AI when teaching or training. Junior analysts learning financial modeling benefit from building models step-by-step. They understand why NOI comes before debt service, why pref return accrues cumulatively, why IRR requires cash flow timing. Formula AI supports this learning process. Model AI's black-box generation does not.
Choose Model AI for portfolio companies or clients. If you are a consultant delivering models to clients, speed matters. Clients pay for insights, not Excel construction. Model AI lets you generate client deliverables quickly. You allocate time to analysis and recommendations, not formatting cells.
Choose both for different contexts. Many analysts use Formula AI for legacy templates and daily formula questions, while using Model AI for net-new deals requiring full model builds. The tools are complementary. Each fits specific use cases. The question is not "which is better" but "which fits this task."
