Apers_

LEARN

Pad Sites & Outparcels: Ground Lease Economics, QSR Credit, and the 2026 Cap Rate Stack

October 2026 · 17 min

Key Takeaways

  • The Q2 2026 outparcel cap-rate stack runs 4.45% (McDonald's and Chick-fil-A corporate ground leases) to 6.85% (all-brand franchisee QSR median) per Boulder Group's Q2 2026 medians, reported in its Q3 2026 Net Lease Market Report. The stack spans 240 bps from the McDonald's ground-lease median to the all-brand franchisee median; the like-for-like corporate-vs-franchisee guarantor spread is 70–100 bps.
  • "Outparcel" and "pad site" describe the same physical asset through different lenses: outparcel is the legal/zoning term (a separately platted parcel carved out of a larger center), pad site is the transaction term. Institutional documents use both; never treat them as different products.
  • The corporate vs. franchisee QSR spread is 100 bps at the Q2 2026 medians per Boulder Group (all corporate QSR 5.85% vs. all franchisee QSR 6.85%), running 70–100 bps across term-remaining buckets in Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term data. Franchisee paper is not discounted corporate paper. It is a different security with different default behavior.
  • Subordinated ground leases let the fee owner pledge the land to the operator's leasehold lender; unsubordinated leases do not. Unsubordinated is the safer, more common fee position and prices tighter; subordinated fee positions carry more risk and should be underwritten at a wider cap rate (higher rent or lower price).
  • The buyer wedge in a shopping center acquisition with outparcel optionality is the seller's failure to pull forward the carve-out value. A pad worth a 5.00% cap inside a 7.25% blended sale is worth 20.0x NOI rather than 13.8x, about $6.21 of value (+45%) per dollar of pad NOI. In the worked example below, two pads carry ~$1.32M of value the blended cap does not price; the underwriting must isolate the pad cash flow before pricing the rump center.

The 2026 Outparcel Cap Rate Stack

The 2026 net-lease retail market carries its cap-rate stack with overall net-lease cap rates at their highest level in over a decade (6.92% in Boulder Group's Q3 2026 print). Boulder Group's Q2 2026 medians, the canonical quarterly print for single-tenant net lease pricing (shown as the previous-quarter column of its Q3 2026 Net Lease Market Report), have McDonald's corporate ground leases asking 4.45%, Chick-fil-A ground leases at 4.45%, Chipotle at 5.50%, and Starbucks at 6.50%. The 10-Year Treasury traded in the mid-4% range during Q2 2026 (4.44% at the June 30 quarter-end), surged to 5.24% on September 28, 2026, its highest level since mid-2007 at that date, and reached 5.31% on October 5 before easing to 5.22% on October 8 (FRED). The McDonald's and Chick-fil-A Q2 ground-lease asks sat roughly 79 bps inside the September 28 10-year yield (77 bps inside the October 8 reading). That is the headline of the cycle. Boulder's Q3 2026 Net Lease Tenant Profiles report shows a similar range: McDonald's 15-year ground leases quoted at 4.35–4.65% and Chick-fil-A at 4.15–4.45% as of September 2026.

The bifurcation that matters more than the headline is between corporate-guaranteed and franchisee-guaranteed QSR. The same Boulder Group report bins all corporate QSR at 5.85% and all franchisee QSR at 6.85% (Q2 2026), a 100 bps headline spread that Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term data holds between 70 and 100 bps when controlled for term remaining. The franchisee paper is not "the same building with a cheaper guarantor." It is a structurally different security: the rent cash flow runs through an operating LLC with operator-level financials, no parent guarantee, and a default profile that historically clusters around regional recessions and brand-level operating margin compression. The cap-rate spread compensates for that; it is not a market mispricing.

The 2026 outparcel cap rate stack by brand credit (Boulder Group Q2 2026)The 2026 outparcel cap rate stack by brand creditBOULDER GROUP Q2 2026 MEDIANS (Q3 2026 NET LEASE MARKET REPORT)10-YEAR UST 5.24% (SEP 28, 2026)MCDONALD'S GL4.45%Corporate guarantee, S&P BBB+, brand ground-lease medianCHICK-FIL-A GL4.45%Private parent, corporate guarantee, opaque financialsALL CORPORATE QSR5.85%Corporate-operated parent on the rent obligation (rated and unrated brands)CHIPOTLE5.50%Public, not rated; all U.S. stores company-ownedSTARBUCKS6.50%Typically double net, 10-year term: short-paper discountFRANCHISEE-GUARANTEED QSR6.85%Operator-LLC paper, regional recession risk, 70–100 bps premium vs corporate240 bps from McDonald's GL to the all-brand franchisee QSR median.Like-for-like corporate-vs-franchisee spread: 70–100 bps.Apers_
The Q2 2026 outparcel cap rate stack ordered by brand credit. McDonald's corporate ground lease at 4.45% sits roughly 79 bps inside the 10-Year Treasury at 5.24% (September 28, 2026). The stack spans 240 bps from the McDonald's ground-lease median to the all-brand franchisee QSR median; the like-for-like corporate-vs-franchisee guarantor spread is 70–100 bps, the institutional pricing question every pad-site underwriter resolves first.

The 10-Year Treasury context matters. During Q2 2026 the 10-year traded in the mid-4% range (4.44% at the June 30 quarter-end), essentially flat to the 4.45% McDonald's GL ask. Since then the 10-year has climbed to 5.24% on September 28, 2026 (at that date its highest level since mid-2007) and as high as 5.31% on October 5, while the GL asks moved only 5 bps (to 4.50% in Boulder's Q3 2026 print). On September 28, 2026 the McDonald's GL traded inside the risk-free rate by roughly 79 bps (74 bps on the Q3 ask). This is not a bond-pricing anomaly; it reflects three things institutional buyers are paying for that the Treasury doesn't offer: the fee-simple reversion at end of term (recovery of the land, and usually the building, when the lease and options expire), the embedded rent growth (fixed bumps or CPI escalations), and the 1031-exchange demand from private-capital buyers competing with the institutional bid for the same paper. The negative nominal spread is the market's signal that the reversion option plus the inflation hedge plus the tax-deferral demand together exceed the absolute level of the risk-free curve.

Outparcel vs Pad Site: Vocabulary Matters

The two terms describe the same physical asset through different professional lenses. An outparcelis the legal and zoning vocabulary: a separately platted parcel carved out of a larger shopping center, with its own legal description, tax ID, and reciprocal easement agreement (REA) governing parking and access. Apad site is the transaction and brokerage vocabulary: the developable lot in front of a center, fronting the highest-traffic road frontage, suited to a single-tenant build with a drive-thru.

Institutional underwriters see both terms in the same deal document. The zoning attorney writes "the Outparcel A described in Exhibit 2"; the broker's offering memorandum lists "Pad 1, drive-thru pad with QSR LOI." Treat them as synonyms in conversation, but never lose the distinction when reading the documents: the outparcel's legal severability (the REA terms, the parking ratio carve-out, the signage easement) is what makes the pad site a discrete asset that can be sold, financed, and developed without the consent of the inline center's lender. If the REA is sloppy, the pad's marketability is impaired.

DimensionOutparcel (legal/zoning)Pad Site (transaction)
Document contextPlat map, REA, zoning approvals, title workOM, LOI, purchase agreement, ground lease
What it identifiesA separately platted, taxed, deeded parcelA single-tenant developable lot, usually with drive-thru
Typical sizeSet by the plat; varies by jurisdictionSized to the tenant's prototype building and drive-thru
Critical sub-documentREA (reciprocal easement agreement)Ground lease or fee purchase agreement
Who uses the termCounsel, planners, title officersBrokers, sponsors, developers, lenders

The same physical lot, two professional vocabularies. Read both terms in the same deal documents and never assume they describe different products.

Ground Lease Mechanics: Term, Escalations, Reversion

A ground lease conveys the right to occupy and improve a parcel of land for a long fixed term (typically 20 to 99 years) while the underlying fee title remains with the lessor. The tenant constructs and owns the building; the landlord owns the dirt and recovers it (and the building, depending on the lease form) at expiry. For institutional QSR outparcels, the structural variables that drive value are four: term length, escalation mechanic, subordination, and reversion.

Term length drives the buyer's underwriting horizon and the lender's amortization assumption. McDonald's own leases (as lessee) are generally 20 years where market conditions allow, with renewal options (McDonald's 10-K); QSR ground leases commonly add four to six 5-year tenant extension options, nominally 35–50 years on a 15- to 20-year primary term if all options exercise. In the net-lease sale market, Boulder's tenant profiles give a 15-year typical lease term for both McDonald's (ground lease) and Wendy's (triple net). Chick-fil-A historically runs 15–20 year primary with similar extensions. Starbucks leans shorter: a 10-year primary term with two or three 5-year extensions. The "all options exercised" duration matters less than the primary term remaining: Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term data has corporate QSR at 6.85% with under 10 years remaining versus 6.15% at 10–14 years, so institutional buyers haircut value when primary term remaining drops below 10 years.

Escalations come in three institutional forms: fixed bumps (most common), CPI-linked (with floor and ceiling), and fair-market-value resets at option-period transitions (rare; usually only on long-dated unsubordinated structures). The fixed-bump structure is the institutional norm for QSR because it produces predictable cash flow that fits net-lease REIT modeling. CPI-linked escalations have come back into structuring conversations post-2022 inflation, but Boulder's tenant profiles list 10% every 5 years as the typical escalation for McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Chipotle, Starbucks and Wendy's; the 1031 buyer pool prefers fixed bumps because they're easier to underwrite.

Subordination is the structural feature that most directly drives the cap rate. In anunsubordinated ground lease (the institutional norm post-GFC) the fee owner does not pledge the land to the tenant's leasehold lender. If the operator defaults, the fee owner recovers the land free and clear, leaving the leasehold lender to chase the building (often with limited recovery). In asubordinated ground lease the fee owner does pledge the land, allowing the operator to finance the building with a first-lien mortgage that encumbers both leasehold and fee; the landowner effectively becomes a second or junior lender. Subordinated ground leases price at wider cap rates than unsubordinated structures because the fee owner has pledged the land behind the leasehold mortgage and can lose it in a foreclosure. The unsubordinated fee position is the safer one (senior even to the mortgage) and prices tighter; a subordinated fee position should be underwritten wider, through higher rent or a lower price.

Subordinated vs unsubordinated ground lease structure: financeability and recoverySubordinated vs unsubordinated ground lease: the financeability cascadeWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE OPERATOR DEFAULTSUNSUBORDINATED: SENIOR FEE POSITIONFEE OWNERHolds clean land, no pledge to leasehold lenderOPERATOR (LEASEHOLD)Owns building, leasehold lender holds Mtg on building onlyON DEFAULTFee owner recovers land; leasehold lender chases the buildingSUBORDINATED: FEE BEHIND THE LENDERFEE OWNERPledges land to operator's senior lender (subordination)OPERATOR + LENDERFirst mortgage encumbers both leasehold and fee titleON DEFAULTLender forecloses both; fee owner can lose the landPricing implication: the unsubordinated fee owner holds the senior position and prices tighter.A subordinated fee owner sits behind the leasehold lender: underwrite it wider (higher rent or lower price).Apers_
The financeability cascade for subordinated vs unsubordinated ground leases. Unsubordinated: senior fee position, cleaner reversion, tighter cap rate, lower operator leverage. Subordinated: the fee owner sits behind the leasehold lender and carries foreclosure risk on the land, so price the fee position wider.

Reversion is the asset's terminal value: the fee owner recovers the land (and, depending on the lease form, the building improvements) at end of term. For a 50-year ground lease, the reversion is heavily discounted in PV terms (at 6% discount rate, a dollar in year 50 is worth roughly $0.054 today), which is why most institutional pricing focuses on the in-place cash flow rather than the terminal value. But two reversion features warrant attention: whether improvements revert to the fee owner at term (most leases say yes; the operator effectively donates the building) and whether the lease contains a tenant purchase option (which can collapse the reversion value if exercised). Standard institutional QSR ground leases have no tenant purchase option; the fee owner retains the optionality.

QSR Brand Credit: The Corporate-vs-Franchisee Spread

The 70–100 bps wedge between corporate and franchisee QSR paper is the single most important number in pad-site underwriting. Per Boulder Group's Q2 2026 medians, all corporate QSR asks 5.85% and all franchisee QSR 6.85%. Adjust for term remaining and Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term buckets hold the spread between 70 and 100 bps (100 bps at 20+ years, 85 bps at 15–19 years, 70 bps at 10–14 years and under 10 years).

To make the spread concrete, hold the physical asset and lease form constant and vary the rent obligor. Take a QSR ground-lease pad at a 1.0-acre site in a Sun Belt MSA generating $125,000 annual ground rent, priced first with a corporate obligor at 4.45%, Boulder's Q2 2026 McDonald's and Chick-fil-A ground-lease median (the top of the corporate stack; the all-brand corporate QSR median is 5.85%, at which the same rent is worth $2,136,752), then with a franchisee operator LLC at Boulder's 70, 85 or 100 bps corporate-vs-franchisee spread. Boulder publishes no brand-level franchisee ground-lease rate, so the franchisee rows are an illustrative application of the term-bucket spread:

StructureCap RateImplied ValueΔ vs Corporate
Corporate ground lease (top-tier corporate obligor, Boulder Q2 2026 McDonald's and Chick-fil-A GL median)4.45%$2,808,989n/a
Same rent, franchisee operator LLC (+70 bps, Boulder 10–14 and under-10-year buckets)5.15%$2,427,184($381,804) / −13.6%
Same rent, franchisee operator LLC (+85 bps, Boulder 15–19 year bucket)5.30%$2,358,491($450,498) / −16.0%
Same rent, franchisee operator LLC (+100 bps, Boulder 20+ year bucket)5.45%$2,293,578($515,411) / −18.3%

Same physical asset, same ground rent, different obligors. Holding lease form constant, the corporate obligor represents roughly $0.4–0.5M of incremental value vs. franchisee paper at the same rent, depending on term bucket. Boulder's McDonald's tenant profile gives a 15-year typical lease term (4.35–4.65% at 15 years), which maps to the +85 bps row (about $0.45M). The wedge is not arbitrage; it's the obligor-credit risk premium priced into the cap rate.

The institutional reading: the franchisee paper is not a "value play" or "mispriced corporate paper." It is a distinct security with three structural differences from the corporate ground lease. First, the rent obligation runs through an operating LLC whose creditworthiness depends on store-level cash flow, not parent balance sheet. Second, the franchisor typically does not guarantee the franchisee's rent obligation under the lease: the franchise agreement and the ground lease are separate contracts. Third, franchisee default tends to cluster geographically: when a regional franchisee operator runs into margin compression (commodity costs, labor inflation, local recession), the same operator's other stores follow, producing correlated defaults that the institutional buyer pool prices via a portfolio premium.

Practitioner check: when reading a QSR ground-lease OM, read the rent obligor on page one of the lease abstract. "McDonald's USA, LLC" or "McDonald's Corporation" is corporate paper; under a conventional franchise arrangement McDonald's generally owns or secures a long-term lease on the land and building itself (McDonald's 10-K). An operating LLC owned by a franchisee group is franchisee paper. Boulder prices franchisee QSR in a separate table (All Franchisee QSR 6.85% in Q2 2026, with Burger King and Wendy's among the tracked brands); check the obligor before applying any brand cap rate.

Outparcel Value Inside a Shopping Center Acquisition

The underwriting opportunity that the SimonCRE and Matthews developer literature gestures at, without quantifying, is the latent outparcel monetization inside a shopping-center acquisition. The institutional shopping-center seller often hasn't pulled the outparcel value forward into the aggregate sale price. The buyer who isolates the pad cash flow, prices it at the QSR-specific cap rate, and reverse-solves the rump-center value captures the spread.

Concrete arithmetic. A 120,000 SF grocery-anchored center with two outparcel pads (one McDonald's corporate GL, one Starbucks) is offered at a 7.25% blended cap rate on $4.5M of in-place NOI, an implied value of $62.1M. The pad NOIs are $125K (McDonald's GL) and $145K (Starbucks). Priced at brand-specific Q2 2026 cap rates, McDonald's at 4.45% and Starbucks at 6.50% (Boulder's all-Starbucks median, which reflects its typical double-net lease rather than a ground lease), the two pads carry a combined value of roughly $2.81M + $2.23M = $5.04M. At the blended 7.25% cap, those same NOIs implied just $3.72M of value.

The buyer's wedge: the two pads are mispriced inside the blended cap by approximately $1.32M. The institutional acquirer carves them post-close, sells to a 1031 or net-lease REIT buyer, and recovers the spread without the seller having had the opportunity to capture it. The rump-center cap rate on the inline grocery-anchored box (which is what's actually been transacted) is the residual: ($4.5M − $0.27M) / ($62.1M − $5.04M) = $4.23M / $57.0M = 7.42%, not 7.25%. That ~17 bps of repricing on the rump is the math the seller didn't surface.

Shopping center with outparcels: blended vs brand-specific cap rate pricingThe latent outparcel monetization wedge inside a shopping center sale120,000 SF GROCERY-ANCHORED CENTER + 2 OUTPARCELS · Q2 2026 PRICINGINLINE: GROCERY ANCHORED, 120K SFNOI $4.23M / rump cap 7.42% / value $57.0MPAD 1: MCDONALD'S GLNOI $125K / cap 4.45%$2.81MPAD 2: STARBUCKSNOI $145K / cap 6.50%$2.23MSELLER ASK7.25% blended on $4.5M$62.1MCARVE-OUT VALUEPads at brand caps$5.04MWedge: ~$1.32MThe buyer's underwriting move:1. Isolate the two pad NOIs from the rent roll. 2. Price each pad at its brand-specific Q2 2026 cap rate. 3. Reverse-solve the rump-center cap.4. Underwrite to the rump cap (7.42%, not the seller's 7.25%). 5. Carve pads post-close and recover the spread via 1031 or net-lease REIT buyer.Apers_
The latent outparcel monetization inside a shopping-center acquisition. The seller's blended cap-rate ask undervalues the pad NOIs at their brand-specific cap rates; the institutional buyer captures the wedge by carving post-close.

Two operational caveats. First, the carve-out math only works if the REA permits separable conveyance; some center REAs require seller / co-anchor consent to spin a pad. Read the REA before pricing the wedge. Second, the rump cap-rate repricing assumes the inline center can stand alone economically after the pads are carved. If pad rent is cross-collateralized with anchor reciprocal commitments, the carve may damage the rump's marketability. The institutional underwriter prices the pad separately and the rump separately and keeps the cross-checks visible.

How to Model It

The pad-site / outparcel underwriting workflow has four computational pieces that belong in distinct tabs of any institutional pro forma. They are not difficult individually; they're easy to get wrong when combined.

Tab 1: Lease abstract and obligor identification. Capture the rent obligor name (exact legal entity), the parent guarantor (if any), the primary term remaining, the extension option count and length, the escalation schedule (fixed bumps with frequency and percentage, or CPI with floor / ceiling), and the subordination status. Every downstream calculation depends on these inputs. The most common underwriting error is using a corporate cap rate against a franchisee-guarantor lease; build a hard- coded validation that flags any sheet where the obligor entity doesn't match the brand's corporate naming convention.

Tab 2: Cap rate selection from the brand-credit stack. Build a lookup table indexed by (brand, guarantor type, primary term remaining bucket) from the latest Boulder Group print. The McDonald's ground-lease row reads 4.45% (Q2 2026 brand median; Boulder's Q3 2026 profile quotes 4.35–4.65% for a 15-year term and 4.50–4.80% for a 10-year term); Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term data has corporate QSR widening from 5.00% at 20+ years remaining to 6.85% under 10 years (the short-paper haircut). The Starbucks row at 6.50% is already a short-paper price because Starbucks' standard term structure tops out around 10 years primary; don't double-haircut.

Tab 3: Cash flow schedule. Project annual ground rent with the contractual escalations through the primary term plus expected option periods, then discount at the selected cap rate to get the in-place value. For institutional outparcel pricing, the cap-rate-on-current-rent shortcut is the standard market convention; the full DCF is only worth running when escalation timing differs materially from the standard 5-year fixed-bump pattern, or when CPI-linked escalations require an inflation forecast.

Tab 4: Carve-out sensitivity (for shopping-center deals). When the pad sits inside a larger acquisition, build a two-step sensitivity: (a) pad value at brand-specific cap rate vs. pad value at blended cap rate (the gross wedge); (b) rump-center cap rate at the residual NOI (the repricing). The wedge minus any carve-out friction (broker fees on the pad sale, legal cost to amend the REA, tax implications) is the buyer's net accretion.

Build It in Apers

BUILD IT IN APERS

The AQ-331 Retail Value-Add Pro Forma Model handles the outparcel underwriting workflow inside a shopping-center acquisition: lease-abstract intake by tenant, brand-credit cap-rate lookup against the Q2 2026 Boulder Group stack, pad carve-out value vs. blended pricing, and the rump-center repricing on residual NOI. Drop the rent roll, identify the pad obligors, and the model returns the carve-out wedge with a one-click sensitivity on cap-rate compression scenarios. Part of a growing library of institutional retail models.

Common Mistakes in Outparcel Underwriting

  • Conflating outparcel and inline retail. The pad is a different product from the inline retail behind it: different tenant credit, different lease form, different cap rate, often different REA-defined boundary. Pricing the pad at the inline center's blended cap rate undervalues it by the gap between the blended cap and the brand cap (75–280 bps in the example above). Always isolate the pad rent roll.

  • Treating franchisee paper as corporate paper. "QSR pad" means nothing until you identify the rent obligor. "McDonald's Corporation" is corporate paper at 4.45% (Q2 2026 ground-lease median); a Burger King or Wendy's franchisee's operating LLC is franchisee paper, which Boulder prices in a separate table (Q2 2026 franchisee medians: Burger King 6.40%, Wendy's 5.85%, all-brand 6.85%). Holding lease form and term constant, Boulder's 70–100 bps corporate-vs-franchisee spread is roughly $0.4–0.5M of value on a $125K rent stream priced off a 4.45% corporate base. Read the lease abstract.

  • Ignoring subordination status. A subordinated fee owner has pledged the land behind the operator's leasehold lender and can lose it in a foreclosure, so the fee position should price wider than an unsubordinated one (higher rent or lower price), not tighter. The institutional norm post-GFC is unsubordinated; price any subordinated structure with that risk premium and a hard look at the term remaining and operator credit.

  • Pricing on remaining options without primary-term discipline. A QSR ground lease with 8 years of primary term and four 5-year options has a contractual maximum duration of 28 years, but the institutional pricing convention is to price the primary term and treat options as upside. Net-lease REIT buyers and 1031 buyers haircut value when primary term remaining drops below 10 years; that haircut is in the cap rate (Boulder's Q3 2026 corporate QSR median: 6.85% under 10 years vs. 6.15% at 10–14 years).

  • Mistaking "no rent bumps for 10 years" as a feature. Long-dated flat rent in a ~4% Fed funds environment (3.75%–4.00% target range after the September 2026 hike) is value erosion. Institutional buyers price flat-rent QSR ground leases wider than comparable-term leases with Boulder's typical 10%-every-5-years bumps. The "set it and forget it" flat-rent structure compresses returns under inflation.

  • Skipping the REA before pricing the carve-out wedge. The shopping-center monetization thesis assumes the pad can be separately conveyed. Some REAs require co-anchor or grocer consent for any pad sale, built into the document to prevent the pad's drive-thru traffic from being weaponized against the inline tenants. Read the REA's separable-conveyance provisions before underwriting the carve-out spread.

  • Forgetting the 1031 demand pool sets the floor. In Q2 2026, the McDonald's GL at 4.45% is partly the 1031 exchange buyer pool's price: private capital deferring gains from apartment or office sales into the lowest-friction net-lease product available. When deal flow slows in the institutional channel, the 1031 bid keeps the floor under the prints. Underwriters who price assuming institutional-only demand miss the floor support.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between an outparcel and a pad site?

They describe the same physical asset through different professional vocabularies. 'Outparcel' is the legal and zoning term: a separately platted parcel with its own legal description, tax ID, and reciprocal easement agreement. 'Pad site' is the transaction and brokerage term: a developable lot in front of a shopping center, suited to single-tenant retail with a drive-thru. Institutional deal documents use both terms interchangeably. The distinction matters only when reading the REA and title work, where 'outparcel' carries the specific separability and easement language that makes the pad a discrete conveyable asset.

How does a ground lease work on an outparcel?

The fee owner conveys to the tenant the right to occupy and improve the outparcel for a long fixed term (typically a 15- to 20-year primary term plus 5-year extension options, 35 to 50 years in total on QSR), in exchange for periodic ground rent. The tenant constructs and operates the building; the landlord owns the land. Standard institutional ground leases are unsubordinated: the fee owner does not pledge the land to the tenant's leasehold lender, keeping the senior, safer fee position and preserving residual recovery in default. Rent typically escalates on a fixed-bump schedule (Boulder Group's tenant profiles list 10% every 5 years as typical for major QSR brands); some structures use CPI-linked escalations with floor and ceiling. At expiry, improvements typically revert to the fee owner.

What is a typical pad site cap rate in 2026?

The Q2 2026 outparcel cap-rate stack per Boulder Group's net lease research runs from 4.45% (McDonald's and Chick-fil-A corporate ground leases) to 6.85% (all-brand franchisee QSR median), a 240 bps span; the like-for-like corporate-vs-franchisee guarantor spread is 70 to 100 bps. Specific brand prints: Chipotle 5.50%, Starbucks 6.50%, all corporate QSR 5.85%. The 10-Year Treasury traded in the mid-4% range during Q2 2026 (4.44% at the June 30 quarter-end) and reached 5.24% on September 28, 2026, putting the McDonald's GL roughly 79 basis points inside the 10-year yield on that date (FRED shows 5.31% on October 5 and 5.22% on October 8, 2026), reflecting the fee-reversion option, embedded rent growth, and 1031 demand together exceeding the absolute curve level.

Are outparcels good investments for institutional buyers?

For institutional buyers such as net-lease REITs (Realty Income, Agree Realty, NETSTREIT), REPE shops with retail mandates, and 1031 exchange capital, outparcels with corporate-guaranteed QSR ground leases are among the lowest-friction core net-lease products available: long-dated cash flow, corporate credit on the rent obligation (S&P BBB+ for McDonald's; Chick-fil-A is private and not rated), simple operating profile (no landlord opex on a pure ground lease), and 1031 eligibility. The institutional bid drives the cap rates to their tight 2026 levels. Franchisee-guaranteed paper is a different security with a 70 to 100 bps premium reflecting operator-LLC credit risk and correlated regional default exposure.

How long do outparcel ground leases typically run?

QSR ground leases typically run a 15 to 20-year primary term plus four to six 5-year tenant extension options, a nominal contractual maximum of 35 to 50 years if all options exercise. McDonald's own leases are generally 20 years where market conditions allow, per its 10-K; Boulder Group's tenant profiles show a 15-year typical term for both McDonald's and Wendy's listings. Chick-fil-A historically runs 15 to 20-year primary. Starbucks is shorter: 10-year primary plus 2 to 3 option periods. Institutional pricing convention focuses on primary term remaining, not the all-options-exercised duration; net-lease REIT buyers haircut value when primary term remaining drops below 10 years.

What is the corporate-vs-franchisee QSR ground lease spread?

Per Boulder Group's Q2 2026 medians, all corporate QSR asks 5.85% and all franchisee QSR asks 6.85%, a 100 bps headline spread that Boulder's Q3 2026 median-by-term data holds between 70 and 100 bps controlled for term remaining. The spread reflects three structural differences: the franchisee rent obligation runs through an operating LLC rather than a parent guarantor; the franchisor typically does not guarantee the franchisee's lease obligation; and franchisee defaults tend to cluster regionally, producing correlated portfolio exposure that institutional buyers price via a portfolio premium.

What is a subordinated ground lease?

A subordinated ground lease is a structure where the fee owner pledges the land as collateral to the tenant's leasehold lender. If the operator defaults, the lender can foreclose on both the leasehold and the fee title, and the fee owner can lose the land entirely. The institutional norm post-GFC is unsubordinated: the fee owner does not pledge the land, leaving the leasehold lender to chase only the building in default. Because the subordinated fee owner effectively becomes a junior lender behind the leasehold mortgage, the fee position should be underwritten at a wider cap rate (higher rent or lower price) than an unsubordinated one, which is the senior, safer position and prices tighter.

How do you underwrite outparcels inside a shopping center acquisition?

The institutional move is to isolate the pad NOIs from the rent roll and price each pad at its brand-specific Q2 2026 cap rate, then reverse-solve the implied rump-center cap rate on the residual NOI. The seller's blended cap-rate ask usually undervalues the pads. A McDonald's pad at 4.45% and a Starbucks pad at 6.50% combined are worth materially more than the same NOI priced at a 7.00 to 7.50% center-wide blended cap. The buyer's wedge is the carve-out spread, recoverable post-close by selling the pads to 1031 exchange buyers or net-lease REITs. The carve depends on the REA permitting separable conveyance. Read the REA before pricing the wedge.

Sources

Ready to try Apers?

Start using Apers today. No credit card required.

Start for Free